Why I'm Pressing Pause on Advocacy by Tim Querengesser

I grew up reading, a lot, thanks to a mom who was a teacher. And thanks to my dad, who was a typewriter repairman for IBM, I also grew up writing before I was able to construct actual words. My first typed letters, as a four-year-old, taught me that putting it on paper, even if it was gibberish, did something profound. It made your thought permanent. 

Over the past few months I've jumped, forehead first, into advocacy and away from my original life mission, which is writing. Why? I fully believe our city is designed to put some people at risk and that it doesn't really care about this fact, despite its easily-published puffery in high-level strategies. I think this needs to change. And I feel enabled to speak up. I feel burdened with the stories of people I've met profoundly changed by the effects of our indifference and I can craft an argument. I want safer streets. I have volunteered to show up and speak up.

And yet.

I'm a writer. Advocacy fits, sure, but it's not my best shirt. It's like the shirt I can't bring myself to throw out or donate because it has been with me, forever. And yes, seeing problems and telling stories that matter to me is what guides me toward or away from stories. That's just human nature. 

But.

As a writer masquerading as an advocate, I think it's time I call time on this little experiment. I'm tapping out. Leaving the advocacy to the advocates. Writing demands I come back and show it some love. Come write some stuff. Like some books. 

Do I feel my advocacy has mattered? Who knows. I'm hard wired to give a shit, so I'm a bad judge of all of that. I just throw myself in rather than opt out. 

Anyway. Hope we can find a way to make a better, safer, more amazing city somehow. Support the advocates around you. They are likely exhausted. 

  

 

Ten years later, how are we doing on brownfield? by Tim Querengesser

Back in February 2008, international architectural firm HOK submitted a report to an Edmonton committee that analyzed several proposed sites for what would become Rogers Place arena. The report, which was only recently released to the public, analyzed six sites in Edmonton's downtown core and The Quarters. Each site, in the opinion of HOK — a company that builds sports stadiums — presented good opportunities for developers to build upon.

The study provides a rare glimpse into city building. It also provides us with a time-vault today to use to check in on a long-standing blight on Edmonton: its dizzying inventory of brownfield land.

Brownfield land is land that has been developed to a certain level but has either fallen into disrepair, or a lack of use, or into a state of a lower than ideal use. The most well-known example of brownfield land in Edmonton is a surface parking lot. 

The HOK report identified six potential sites where an arena could be built downtown or in The Quarters. Ten years later, after Rogers Place and Ice District have redeveloped one of these brownfield parcels, I thought it would be interesting to check in on the other five as a way to ponder just how well we're doing using these massive brownfield gaps.

I see them like cavities. I also see them as huge parcels of land that could see housing built for people, centrally, while our city, nonetheless, continues to sprawl outwards to house new residents. 

Here's my very quick look at what's changed since the 2008 HOK report. 


***

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 8.35.13 PM.png

SITE #1: North Post Office
STATS: 6.54 acres
WHERE: Immediately north of the new Royal Alberta Museum
STATUS TODAY: Still largely brownfield

This site was not favoured by the HOK analysts because an arena would be like an "elephant in the neighbourhood" beside the far smaller-scale of buildings and residences in Chinatown. Today the area is as it was in 2008 — mostly surface parking. 

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 8.40.43 PM.png

SITE #2: Quarters 'Option One'
STATS: 7.42 acres
WHERE: 97 Street/103A Avenue
STATUS TODAY: Still largely brownfield

This site was found to be appealing for its proximity to the City Hall plaza and its creation of a gateway into The Quarters. It was noted to be difficult because of the perceived "wall" that 97 Street creates for downtown, as everything east of it is economically challenged. The analysts also noted acquiring property for this site would be challenging. 

Today the proposed site is still largely surface parking. 

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 8.50.45 PM.png

SITE #3: Quarters 'Option Two'
STATS: 5.97 acres
WHERE: From Jasper north to 102 Avenue, between 96 Street and 97 Street
STATUS TODAY: Still largely brownfield, with vibrant uses


This is an interesting one. Our new eastern spur of the bike-lane network stretches through here. And vibrant, essential groups like iHuman are here. What's also here, however, are several surface parking lots. 

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 8.55.49 PM.png

SITE #4: Post Office
STATS: 6.15 acres (or up to 17.19 acres including the full brownfield HOK identified)
WHERE: 97 Street/103A Avenue
STATUS: Partially developed — Royal Alberta Museum, EPCOR Tower

Success. Mostly. Today this is the soon-to-open Royal Alberta Museum. The site HOK inspected, however, covers the current spot where the EPCOR tower was built, a still-existing surface parking lot to its immediate south, and land that would have been used by the failed Galleria proposal. 

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 9.03.18 PM.png

SITE #5: Casino Site
STATS: 7.7 acres
WHERE: 101 Street at 104 Avenue
STATUS: Awaiting planned development, still brownfield and home to Baccarat Casino


A May 8 story in the Edmonton Journal paraphrased Glen Scott, president of Katz Group Real Estate, reporting that he said an office tower is being considered for the Baccarat Casino property but nothing will be built until market conditions are right. 

 

 

 

Walkcast Ep. 09 — Failure: How one family has lost faith with Edmonton's Vision Zero campaign by Tim Querengesser

 Flickr/Bill Wren

Flickr/Bill Wren

As Edmonton council prepares to inspect the city's latest Vision Zero report today (Wednesday, May 2), I caught up with Jane Cardillo and Steve Finkelman.

Cardillo and Finkelman lost their son, David Finkelman, after a driver hit and killed him in a crosswalk on Whyte Avenue in 2014. Four years later, after first pushing hard and working with the city on its Vision Zero campaign, the two say they have lost faith in the campaign, which is producing mediocre results. 

They are calling for big changes. 

We spoke in their home. David's electric guitar still sits in its stand in the living room. The background noise you occasionally will hear are birds, a distant radio and their border collie coming by to visit. 

Walkcast Ep. 08 — Missed Connections by Tim Querengesser

 Scott Rollans in front of his house in Central McDougall/Tim Querengesser

Scott Rollans in front of his house in Central McDougall/Tim Querengesser

"When the LRT came to our neighbourhood, it was designed for an arena and a mall," says Scott Rollans, a resident of Central McDougall in Edmonton.

In episode eight we ponder how that happened. Just who is LRT for? Is it for things and for people with money? Or is it for people who are on their feet and need transportation options?

Edmonton recently built a $655M LRT called the Metro Line right through Central McDougall. The line famous for all the wrong reasons, the main one being its signals do not work and that's messing up the rest of the city's system. But beyond that, for residents of Central McDougall, it's famous for rolling through without stopping.

The episode references a story by @estolte. Here's the link (edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news…u-of-a-students)

Please support Walkcast on Patreon: www.patreon.com/rss/timquerengess…2Bt2ho6yXuaLS3c6Y